A lot of concerned citizens understand that certainly, we should be aware of the domestic dangers of a militaristic state; true, we cannot afford to be the world’s policeman; sure, military operations in complex countries on the brink of civil war have only a small chance of being successful, etc. but still, States should try their best to promote freedom abroad.

But States don’t do that. Their essence is to be managed by regular sociopaths with omnipotent powers; therefore their leaders are by nature effective political manipulators and incompetent policy talking heads.

Statesmen are in a violent worldwide competition for population control. The bottom-line is that, by definition, States are not in the freedom business. Advancing liberal values is at best a side-effect.

It is time to have that debate about foreign affairs. I hope we will then realize that the best way to advance freedom abroad is to have a non-interventionist State and a civil society that is free to offer food to the famished, healthcare to the wounded, communications to the silenced, security to the oppressed, transportation to the cornered, housing and jobs to the exiled.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s